11. MECHANISM OF REINCARNATION

▪ Well, This is the Most the most waiting part for Skeptics, Atheists and Other non Believers of Reincarnation.

▪ One True thing we have to say About Medical Science That, Medical Science is purely based on Clinical Case studies and not on Mechanism, Of course Mechanism is important But what I am Meaning to say is there are So many Unknown Mechanisms Exists in Modern Medical Science Where we Don’t know Exact Mechanism But still we Treat Patients it is just based on patient’s Response to certain Drugs in Clinical Case Studies, They commonly termed as ‘Idiopathic Conditions’.

▪ One more True thing Regarding Medical Science is Identification of New Disease is Again begins with case study First, Example say No One knew what is HIV Untill so millions of People's died with HIV, No One knew What is H1N1 until millions of people died.
In case of New Diseases or A Condition Clinical Case study is very important, What are signs and symptoms patients have, Brief History taking, General Physical Examination, Systemic Examination, Then Laboratory Diagnosis like Blood test, Urine test, X-Ray, MRI etc to identify cause whether Disease is caused by Bacteria or parasite or virus or fungus or Autoimmune or a Physiological or psychological condition etc, Then last is Mechanism of the Disease.

▪ One More True thing About Science is
Science is based on
a. Assumption:- It is just imagination which does not have any supportive Evidence.

bHypothesis:- When Assumption is supported by little evidence it becomes Hypothesis
Eg:- Tucker Hypothesis, Response to injury Hypothesis, Monoclonal Hypothesis etc.

c. Theory:- When Assumption got more and more Evidence then it becomes theory, Theories have highest Priority than Assumptions and Hypothesis. eg:- The Big Bang Theory, Modern Theory of Evolution etc.

d. Law:- Which is 100% Proved through Scientific Analysis, Experimental, Theoretical, Mathematical study etc. Eg:- Law of Gravity, Gas Law, Boyle’s Law etc.

You Need all these Basics to Understand Next Concepts.

POSSIBLE MECHANISMS OF REINCARNATION

▪ Just I Remembered My forgotten Memories doesn't mean i have Disease it's just Psychological phenomenon.

▪ Currently Reincarnation is Classified under idiopathic Conditions, also Concept of Reincarnation is included in Parapsychology.

▪ There are possible Mechanisms for it

Jim Tucker Hypothesis of Mechanism of Reincarnation

▪ This is One of the Most Accepted Theory in Parapsychology.

▪ Parapsychology is a field of study concerned with the investigation of paranormal and psychic phenomena which include telepathy, precognition, clairvoyance, psychokinesis, near-death experiences, reincarnation, apparitional experiences, and other paranormal claims.

▪ Tucker Hypothesis is Purely based on Case Studies.

▪ Jim B Tucker is a Children Psychiatrist, For nearly 15 years, Tucker has been investigating claims made by children, usually between the ages of 2 and 6 years old, who say they’ve had past lives.








▪ Based on Case Studies Tucker Made Following Observations

▪ Not all memories claims to be past life memories, Most of cases will be just imagination or Hallucination or Cryptomnesia etc only in few cases it would be True memory. So Specialists always checks the Authenticity by thorough Medical, Psychological Examination and Circumstantial Evidences is very important in all Claimed Cases.

▪ 60% of Children Who Claim Past Life Memories are Males and 40% are Females.

▪ 70% of Children Who Claim Past Life Memories had violent death in their Previous Life.

▪ 90% of Children who Claim Past Life were the Same Sex in a Previous Life as they are Now.

▪ The Median Time Between Death and Rebirth was 16 Months and in very Rare cases it was up to Years.

▪ 20% of Children Claim Memories of the time between Death and Rebirth.

▪ Almost 99% of Children who Claims Past Life Memories had Birth Marks which Exactly Corresponds to the Fatal injuries of Person whom they Claim.

▪ 60% of Children who Claims Past Life Memories had almost similar handwriting features of the person whom they claim as their past life.

▪ 60% of Children who claim Past Life Memories had all Confidential Knowledge of the person whom they claim as their past life.

▪ 90% of Cases of Children who claim Past Life Memories are Psychologically Normal and There was No Familial History of Similar Complaints.

▪ In almost 99% of Cases of Children who claim Past Life Memories belongs to Age between 2 years to 6 Years.

▪ In all 100% of Cases of Children who claim Past Life Memories, On Hypnotherapy they were able to remember their Memories Even in more Detail.

BASED ON ALL ABOVE OBSERVATION AND AFTER RULED OUT ALL ABNORMAL PSYCHOLOGICAL CONDITION

▪ DR. JIM TUCKER CONCLUDED THAT

▪ IN MOST OF CASES OF CHILDREN CLAIM OF PAST MEMORIES, MEMORIES ARE DUE TO
“ IMAGINATION OR HALLUCINATION OR ESP OR SCHIZOPHRENIA OR VAGUE RESPONSE OR STORIES TOLD BY PARENTS OR ANY OTHER PERSON OR READ IN INTERNET OR IN MEDIA”.

▪ BUT IN SOME OF MOST AUTHENTIC CASES MEMORIES FROM CHILDREN SUBCONSCIOUS MIND.



















▪ And IT IS THE INDIVIDUAL CONSCIOUSNESS WHICH IS REINCARNATING.

▪ JIM TUCKER DOESN'T HAD ANY MEDICAL EVIDENCE OTHER THAN CASE STUDIES TO PROVE HIS CLAIM BECAUSE

▪ Medical Science has Evidence to show that Individual Memory is Stored in Brain and Consciousness is Arising from Brain.

Medical Science Evidence was

▪ The view in Neuroscience is that consciousness as we know it is entirely generated by the brain and does not exist separately from or independent of the brain.
▪ The Evidences for believing this are straightforward: Chemically and electrically interacting with the brain can modify or extinguish consciousness (dreamless sleep, general anesthesia, drugs, brain death); and there have been no reproducible experiments that have been able to show causal interaction with consciousness without interfacing with the brain first.
ul UK
▪ Thus Dr. Jim Tucker Claim was considered to be just Assumption Supported by Little Evidence of Case Studies

▪ But Latest Research Study in the Field of Consciousness and Near Death Experience Supported the Jim Tucker Hypothesis.

Facts that Supports Jim Tucker Hypothesis

a. Consciousness is just Expressed through Brain and Can Exist independent from Brain.

▪ We Request Everyone to watch these videos without miss

WATCH THIS BELOW VIDEOS
HERE DR. BRUCE GREYSON EXPLAINS THIS CLAIM WITH PROOF (PLEASE DON'T MISS TO WATCH THIS VIDEO).


(Best Videos We ever saw with great explanation)

AMAZING MEDICAL SCIENCE FACTS SUGGESTING THAT CONSCIOUSNESS CAN EXIST INDEPENDENT OF BRAIN.

Are you just a physical entity, ultimately reducible to the physical entity known as your brain? Is that organ—a bundle of neurons weighing about three pounds—the source of all your thoughts, feelings, and any illusion you may have of a “soul” or a “spirit”?
I recently finished reading a 600-plus-page book by a group of academic psychiatrists, psychologists, and philosophers, calledIrreducible Mind, that argues exactly the opposite. The book presents a huge body of evidence from scientific studies of psychokinesis, split personalities, psychic healing, near-death experiences, and other phenomena that seems to constitute powerful proof that, while the mind and the brain obviously interact, the former is not reducible to the latter and there are circumstances where consciousness clearly exists and functions independently of the brain.

Irreducible Mind is a subversive endeavor, swimming against the tide of about a century of scientific reductionism (though not, it should be stressed, in quantum physics) that says all phenomena, including your most delicate or exalted sentiments, are ultimately physical. The book has definitely had some impact; googling the title gets almost two million results, and though published back in 2007 it keeps selling well on Amazon.

One of the coauthors is Bruce Greyson, a professor of psychiatry at the University of Virginia and leading researcher of near-death experiences. A few months ago a videosurfaced of a lecture Greyson gave in India in 2011. It’s about an hour long, fascinating, and seems to point to even more dramatic findings since Irreducible Mind was published seven years ago.

Greyson presents four lines of evidence for the mind as an independent entity, which I’ve taken the trouble to summarize, and they could be an eye-opener. First he gives this caveat: The evidence that I’m going to discuss…is derived entirely from scientific research. But I do not want to give you the impression that this evidence is…accepted by Western scientists. In fact, most Western scientists are completely unaware that this evidence even exists.

1. Lucidity in the last moments

PJ-mind-brain1

A person has a disorder such as a brain tumor or Alzheimer’s. Mental functioning declines severely, and the person eventually dies. Isn’t that proof that the brain determines consciousness?

It might be, except that there have been numerous cases over the past 250 years in which people with such disorders regained full, lucid mental functioning in the last minutes, hours, or even days before death, including full awareness of their own and others’ identity. It has happened, Greyson says, in cases where the person’s brain had “deteriorated to an irreversible degree” according to evidence from brain scans and autopsies.

Greyson says that, while such cases are rare, 83 of them have been mentioned in the Western medical literature. He cites examples of the phenomenon, including one reported by a psychologist in Iceland about an 81-year-old woman with Alzheimer’s. The woman had been demented for a long time and was living in a nursing home. Her family took turns visiting her even though she didn’t recognize them and hadn’t spoken to them for a year. On one occasion, her son Leiter [?] was sitting at her bedside, working on a crossword puzzle. Suddenly she looked up at him. She looked at him directly in the face and said, “My son Leiter, I’m going to recite a verse for you.” She then recited a poem clearly and loudly. She then lay back on her pillow and remained quiet until she died.

Greyson goes on to say that there is no known physiological mechanism for this phenomenon. It is indeed rare, but the fact that it happens at all has no explanation in terms of how the brain functions. …. It is as if the damaged brain prevents the person from thinking and communicating, but then as the brain finally begins to die, consciousness is released from [its] grasp….

2. Advanced mind, minimal brain

PJ-mind-brain-2

Stranger still, there are people walking around who have full, normal mental functioning—sometimes even on a high intellectual level—while not having much of a brain.
Greyson starts with a case published in 2007 where a young girl underwent surgery after she was injured and knocked unconscious in an automobile accident. An X-ray of her head just before surgery revealed that she had no cerebral cortex at all; she had just a brain stem inside her skull. And when the surgeon opened up her skull to operate, that is exactly what he found: just a brain stem with no cerebral cortex.

Greyson goes on to explain that the brain stem cannot perform “higher cognitive functions like thinking, perceiving, making decisions, and so on.” That can only be done in the cerebral cortex—which this young girl now lacked. And yet, even though she “should have been completely unable to formulate any thought of any kind,” she was actually a high school honors student and was accepted by Smith College.

John Lorber was a British neurologist who specialized in children with hydrocephalus, known as water on the brain. The condition, Greyson says, usually lead[s] to blindness, seizures, mental retardation, paralysis, and if it’s not treated, to death. However, Lorber described dozens of children, and eventually some adults, who had severe hydrocephalus but seemed to lead normal lives. In fact, in a sample of children in whom the cerebral spinal fluid filled up 95% of their skull, leaving virtually no space for any brain tissue, half of them had IQs greater than 100.

Thirty years ago an article on Lorber’s workwas published in the prestigious journalScience with the title—hyperbolic, but not completely—“Is Your Brain Really Necessary?”
Starting at 27:20 in the video, Greyson shows two brain scans—one of a normal brain, one of a brain with severe hydrocephalus. It’s a striking difference. But it turns out the latter scan is the brain of a graduate student in mathematics at Cambridge University with an IQ of 126.

3. NDEs: Rich consciousness when there shouldn’t be any

PJ-mind-brain-3

Greyson then turns to his specialty, near-death experiences (NDEs). He notes that he’s investigated almost a thousand cases, many of which occurred during clinical death or deep anesthesia when there should be no brain functioning. Yet people who return from these states report vivid, unforgettable, transcendent, life-changing experiences.

But how do we know these aren’t just subjective experiences that occur while the person is losing or regaining consciousness? One way we know, says Greyson, is through the OBE (out-of-body experience) phenomenon. In many NDE cases the person reports leaving the body, hovering (incorporeally) in the operating room, and seeing what’s going on (often before entering a more mystical realm). If some of these people were to give accurate observations—even though in a state of clinical death or deep anesthesia at the time—wouldn’t it mean that their consciousness, their mind, had been functioning independently of their inanimate brain?

Well, they do give such observations, and they’ve been giving them for decades. Greyson offers an example from 1982 where: the American cardiologist Michael Sabom published a study in which he asked near-death experiencers who had reported leaving their bodies during cardiopulmonary resuscitation to describe in detail what they had seen. He also asked a matched group of seasoned cardiac patients to imagine watching their resuscitations and to try to describe it from a third-person perspective. Eighty percent of the matched group who did not have near-death experiences made major errors in their descriptions. None of the near-death experiencers made any errors, and 19 percent of them described specific idiosyncratic and unexpected events that happened during their resuscitation.

And what about bringing back accurate information from the mystical realm itself? There are many of those cases, too. Greyson cites one reported by an American pediatrician, Dr. K. M. Dale, in which a nine-year-old boy with meningitis who hovered near death for 36 hours reported seeing deceased relatives, including his sister Teresa. His parents were upset because Teresa—as far as they knew—was perfectly healthy and going to college in another state. The father called—and found out Teresa had died that night in a car accident.
In another case Greyson mentions, renowned Swiss-American psychiatristElisabeth Kübler-Ross reported about a girl who had a near-death experience during heart surgery and later said she had met her brother, although as far as she knew she never had a brother. Her father, moved by this vivid account, acknowledged that her parents had in fact had a son who had died before she had been born, and they never mentioned him to her.

4. Remembrance of lives past

PJ-mind-brain-4

A child starts talking about a past life, giving very specific details about a place, people, and events that were part of it. Researchers go to the place, often a remote village, and find that the child’s account completely matches the reality. Or the researchers may take the child with them, who accurately identifies people and locations he or she could not possibly have known about.

If this were to happen, it would indicate that minds can journey from one bodily frame to another, and are not yoked to, or produced by, a particular brain. Well, this too happens a lot. Greyson’s group at the University of Virginia has studied over 2500 such cases.
Most of the cases—not all—occur in societies that believe in rebirth, particularly India. In 60 percent of the cases, the past life ended (at the average age of 33) in an accident or a violent attack.
The findings Greyson cites, starting at 49:30, are remarkable, and this is only a sampling: these children often exhibit unusual personality traits, likes and dislikes, that are incompatible with their present lives. For example, some of these children recall a past life of the opposite gender, and they want to dress and play like someone of the opposite gender. A child born to a Hindu family may recall a past life as a Muslim, and he will reject the food his mother cooks because it was not prepared in the Muslim manner….

Some of these children exhibit unusual skills that they have not been taught, and indeed that no one in their village knows. For example, a child may be able to play a musical instrument without being taught…. We have studied children in Sri Lanka in villages where only the Tamil language is spoken, and yet the child can converse in Sinhalese.

Closer to home, in a Christian context where there was no belief in reincarnation, Greyson (58:50) describes the case of a boy born in Louisiana, James Leininger, who recalled being shot down as a pilot 60 years earlier in World War II. The boy eventually remembered the name of his aircraft carrier, the make of his plane, the fact that he was shot down over Iwo Jima, and the name of his best friend and fellow pilot, Jack Larson. In brief, his father investigated, and it all checked out—including locating the sister of the boy’s previous incarnation, a pilot named James Huston.
“There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, / Than are dreamt of in your philosophy.” So Hamlet tells his friend in Shakespeare’s play. He could have been one of today’s cutting-edge researchers addressing a colleague still stuck in the old physicalist paradigm.


b.Theory of Biocentrism, Theory of Neo-BioCentrism Supports That Consciousness is independent of Brain



















This is From above Book you can buy this book in Amazon

▪ Theory of Biocentrism was Proposed by Dr.Robert Lanza who is an expert in regenerative medicine and scientific director at Advanced Cell Technology Company. While he is known for his extensive research on stem cells, he was also famous for several successful experiments on cloning endangered animal species, He is also scientist in the field of physics, quantum mechanics and astrophysics. This explosive mixture has given birth to the new theory of biocentrism.

▪ In the Above Book Using basic postulates of quantum mechanics Dr. Robert Lanza has Explained How consciousness is independent from brain and  exists outside of constraints of time and space.

▪ This Theory of Biocentrism is Further supported by Theory of Neo-BioCentrism Proposed by Professor Stuart Hameroff from the University of Arizona he announced that he has found evidence that consciousness does not perish after death.
































[[Search For Stuart Hameroff Books in Amazon]]

▪ According to Hameroff, the human brain is the perfect quantum computer, and the consciousness, is simply information stored at the quantum level.

▪ It can be transferred, following the death of the body; quantum information carried by consciousness merges with our universe,exists infinitely and can carry quantum information into Another Body.

▪ Sir Roger Penrose, a well-known British physicist and expert in mathematics from Oxford, supports this theory.

▪ Together, the scientists are developing a quantum theory to explain the phenomenon of consciousness.

▪ They believe that they have found carriers of consciousness, the elements that accumulate information during life and “drain” consciousness somewhere else after death.

▪ These elements are located inside protein-based microtubules (neuronal microtubules), which previously have been attributed a simple role of reinforcement and transport channeling inside a living cell.

▪ Based on their structure, microtubules are best suited to function as carriers of quantum properties inside the brain. That is mainly because they are able to Retain quantum states for a long time, meaning they can function as elements of a quantum computer.

CONCLUSION

TO PROVE TUCKER HYPOTHESIS ONE MUST PROVE THREE CLAIMS














▪ Consciousness is independent From Brain
▪ Individual Memories are Actually Stored in Consciousness and not in Brain cells
▪ After Death Consciousness along with its stored Memories Transfers to other Person.

To Prove above Three Claims we have the Following Evidences (Not exactly Evidences it's just Support for claims)

1. Most Authentic Medical Case Studies of Children who Claim to Remember Past life.

2. Children Also Remembering the Confidential information of Person whom they claim as past life.

3. Children Birthmarks, Birth Defects ( some of cases even Handwriting) Exactly Corresponds to Fatal injuries of person whom they claim as Their past life.

4. In all 100% of Cases of Children who claim Past Life Memories, On Hypnotherapy they were able to remember their Memories Even in more Detail.

5. Support from Various studies such as Lucidity in the last moments, Research on Near Death Experiences, Research on Out of Body Experiences, Study on Advanced Brain, Minimal Mind which shows that Consciousness is independent from Brain.

6. Support from theory of Biocentrism, theory of Neo-BioCentrism which uses the basic postulates of Quantum Mechanics.

▪ Currently Reincarnation studies  are included in separate branch called PARAPSYCHOLOGY.
Only Parapsychologists will Study Reincarnation. Also there is also separate Medical Course called
DIPLOMA IN PLRT - Past Life Regression Therapy. (2-3 Years Course).

▪ Reincarnation is not yet Completely Medically Proved but it has above Major 6 Medical Supports Which we have mentioned above Also Remember that Reincarnation is not Disproved Also.
Previous
Next Post »